NEC Nijmegen vs Groningen
Key events
View all
Groningen- K. Ogawa
- K. Ogawa
- S. Hansen
- V. van Crooij
- S. Ouaissa
- T. Ouwejan
NEC NijmegenFT 6–0
Predictions & odds
View allModel outlook versus market-implied chances (overround removed from decimal odds). For entertainment and analysis only — not betting advice.
Model blend
Estimated outcome mix from Sportra's pre-match model
- NEC Nijmegen50%
- Draw50%
- Groningen0%
Prematch market
No prematch 1X2 odds snapshot available.
Live market
No in-play odds snapshot was captured for this match.
Venue
Stadion de Goffert
Nijmegen · Netherlands
- Address
- Stadionplein 1
- Surface
- grass
- Capacity
- 12540
Match
M. Vos
Round 11
- Referee
- M. Vos
- Round
- Round 11
- Date
Competition
League · Netherlands
- Country
- Netherlands (NL)
- Season
- 2024
- Dates
- 2024-08-09 → 2025-06-01
Match statistics
View allKey metrics
Visual snapshot of possession, chance quality, and shooting.
Possession
62%62%38%38%
Expected goals (xG)
3.4592%0.308%
Total shots
1470%630%
Shots on target
686%114%
Team form & competition
View all- #8Position
- 43Points
- 12-7-16W-D-L
- 53/49Goals F/A
- Best wins
- 6-0 / 0-3
- Worst defeats
- 2-3 / 5-0
- #13Position
- 39Points
- 10-9-15W-D-L
- 40/53Goals F/A
- Best wins
- 6-1 / 1-3
- Worst defeats
- 1-3 / 6-0
Head to head
View all7NEC Nijmegenwins
6Drawsmatches
5Groningenwins
Recorded meetings: 18 (available previous meetings, not necessarily all-time).
- Highest scoring
- Groningen 4–3 NEC Nijmegen
- NEC Nijmegen most goals
- NEC Nijmegen 4–0 Groningen
- Groningen most goals
- Groningen 5–2 NEC Nijmegen
/https%3A%2F%2Fsportsmole-media-prod.s3.gra.io.cloud.ovh.net%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F08%2Fbromley-manager-andy-woodman-vs-sheffield-wednesday-in-august-2026-pro-sports-images-6a9307bb5d47b953703126.jpg)
NEC Nijmegen created the clearer chances on xG (3.45 vs 0.30, Δ 3.15). NEC Nijmegen fired more attempts (14 vs 6 shots). NEC Nijmegen was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 17%). NEC Nijmegen held more of the ball (62% possession).
NEC Nijmegen outperformed their xG by 2.5 goals (6 scored vs 3.45 xG).