Match statistics snapshot
- NEC Nijmegen created the clearer chances on xG (3.45 vs 0.30, Δ 3.15).
- NEC Nijmegen fired more attempts (14 vs 6 shots).
- NEC Nijmegen was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Groningen |
|---|---|---|
| 3.45Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.30 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Groningen |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 407Lead | Accurate passes | 202 |
| 472Lead | Total passes | 290 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Groningen |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Groningen |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -1.67 | Goals prevented | -1.67 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nec Nijmegen | Statistic | Groningen |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.