Match statistics snapshot
- Consadole Sapporo fired more attempts (16 vs 5 shots).
- Oita Trinita was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 19%).
- Oita Trinita held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Oita Trinita | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target | 8Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Oita Trinita | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 87% |
| 528Lead | Accurate passes | 443 |
| 594Lead | Total passes | 511 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Oita Trinita | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Oita Trinita | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Oita Trinita | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.