Match statistics snapshot
- Consadole Sapporo fired more attempts (14 vs 8 shots).
- Oita Trinita was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 21%).
- Consadole Sapporo held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Oita Trinita | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Oita Trinita | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 301 | Accurate passes | 450Lead |
| 396 | Total passes | 550Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Oita Trinita | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Oita Trinita | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Oita Trinita | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.