Match statistics snapshot
- Manta FC fired more attempts (17 vs 8 shots).
- Orense SC was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 41%).
- Manta FC held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Orense Sc | Statistic | Manta Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 6 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Orense Sc | Statistic | Manta Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 189 | Accurate passes | 243Lead |
| 262 | Total passes | 312Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Orense Sc | Statistic | Manta Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Orense Sc | Statistic | Manta Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Orense Sc | Statistic | Manta Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |