Match statistics snapshot
- Quevilly fired more attempts (15 vs 6 shots).
- Caen was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 40%).
- Quevilly held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Quevilly | Statistic | Caen |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 2Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Quevilly | Statistic | Caen |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 359Lead | Accurate passes | 324 |
| 439Lead | Total passes | 418 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Quevilly | Statistic | Caen |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Quevilly | Statistic | Caen |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Quevilly | Statistic | Caen |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | Fouls | 17Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |