Match statistics snapshot
- Consadole Sapporo fired more attempts (13 vs 6 shots).
- Sanfrecce Hiroshima was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 8%).
- Sanfrecce Hiroshima held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 1 | Shots off target | 8Lead |
| 2Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 555Lead | Accurate passes | 479 |
| 639Lead | Total passes | 560 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.