Match statistics snapshot
- Sanfrecce Hiroshima created the clearer chances on xG (3.45 vs 0.68, Δ 2.77).
- Sanfrecce Hiroshima fired more attempts (21 vs 5 shots).
- Consadole Sapporo held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 3.45Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.68 |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 301 | Accurate passes | 384Lead |
| 392 | Total passes | 464Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sanfrecce Hiroshima | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.