Match statistics snapshot
- Consadole Sapporo fired more attempts (17 vs 11 shots).
- Vissel Kobe was more accurate in front of goal (73% on target vs 12%).
- Consadole Sapporo held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 1 | Shots off target | 9Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 347 | Accurate passes | 548Lead |
| 442 | Total passes | 638Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.