Match statistics snapshot
- Consadole Sapporo fired more attempts (16 vs 5 shots).
- Vissel Kobe was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 25%).
- Consadole Sapporo held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 0 | Shots off target | 8Lead |
| 5Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 316 | Accurate passes | 586Lead |
| 405 | Total passes | 675Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.