Match statistics snapshot
- Consadole Sapporo fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Vissel Kobe was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 13%).
- Consadole Sapporo held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target | 9Lead |
| 8Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 239 | Accurate passes | 396Lead |
| 333 | Total passes | 474Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |