Match statistics snapshot
- Consadole Sapporo fired more attempts (21 vs 14 shots).
- Consadole Sapporo was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 21%).
- Consadole Sapporo held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 11 | Shots inside the box | 16Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 71%Lead |
| 276 | Accurate passes | 319Lead |
| 392 | Total passes | 451Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.