Match statistics snapshot
- Vissel Kobe created the clearer chances on xG (3.83 vs 0.65, Δ 3.18).
- Vissel Kobe fired more attempts (25 vs 5 shots).
- Vissel Kobe was more accurate in front of goal (48% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 3.83Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.65 |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 20Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 12Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 25Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 220 | Accurate passes | 445Lead |
| 330 | Total passes | 558Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Vissel Kobe | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.