Key events
View all
West Brom- K. Moore
- I. Price
- A. Heggebø
WrexhamFT 1–2
Predictions & odds
View allModel outlook versus market-implied chances (overround removed from decimal odds). For entertainment and analysis only — not betting advice.
Model blend
Estimated outcome mix from Sportra's pre-match model
- Wrexham10%
- Draw45%
- West Brom45%
Prematch market
Source: William Hill
- Wrexham41.9%
- Draw29.7%
- West Brom28.4%
Live market
No in-play odds snapshot was captured for this match.
Venue
STōK Cae Ras
Wrecsam · Wales
- Address
- Mold Road
- Surface
- grass
- Capacity
- 19118
Match
Thomas Kirk
Round 10
- Referee
- Thomas Kirk
- Round
- Round 10
- Date
Competition
League · England
- Country
- England (GB-ENG)
- Season
- 2026
- Dates
- 2026-08-14 → 2027-05-01
Match statistics
View allKey metrics
Visual snapshot of possession, chance quality, and shooting.
Possession
42%42%58%58%
Expected goals (xG)
0.4631%1.0169%
Total shots
847%953%
Shots on target
457%343%
Team form & competition
View all- #14Position
- 14Points
- 2-5-3W-D-L
- 11/15Goals F/A
- Best wins
- 2-1 / 0-3
- Worst defeats
- 1-2 / 6-0
- #5Position
- 20Points
- 5-2-3W-D-L
- 12/10Goals F/A
- Best wins
- 3-1 / 1-2
- Worst defeats
- 0-1 / 3-1
Head to head
View all0Wrexhamwins
1Drawsmatches
1West Bromwins
Recorded meetings: 2 (available previous meetings, not necessarily all-time).
- Highest scoring
- Wrexham 2–3 West Brom
- Wrexham most goals
- West Brom 2–2 Wrexham
- West Brom most goals
- Wrexham 2–3 West Brom
/https%3A%2F%2Fsportsmole-media-prod.s3.gra.io.cloud.ovh.net%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F08%2Fmateo-chavez-l-and-troy-parrott-celebrate-az-alkmaar-s-johan-cruyff-shield-victory-on-august-3-2026-eibner-pressefoto-6a74c291e33b8359569347.jpg)
West Brom created the clearer chances on xG (0.46 vs 1.01, Δ 0.55). West Brom fired more attempts (9 vs 8 shots). Wrexham was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%). West Brom held more of the ball (58% possession).
Wrexham outperformed their xG by 0.5 goals (1 scored vs 0.46 xG). West Brom outperformed their xG by 1.0 goals (2 scored vs 1.01 xG).