Match statistics snapshot
- Mushuc Runa SC fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- Mushuc Runa SC was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 13%).
- Orense SC held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Orense Sc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Orense Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 53% | Pass accuracy | 70%Lead |
| 93 | Accurate passes | 237Lead |
| 176 | Total passes | 340Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Orense Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Orense Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Orense Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |